Under Rule 608, when is extrinsic evidence of specific acts generally admissible?

Enhance your skills for the Mock Trial Test. Utilize flashcards and multiple choice questions with hints and explanations. Prepare effectively for your exam!

Multiple Choice

Under Rule 608, when is extrinsic evidence of specific acts generally admissible?

Explanation:
Rule 608 focuses on impeachment of a witness’s truthfulness. The main idea is that you may attack credibility by reputation or opinion about truthfulness, or by asking about specific acts on cross-examination. But you may not prove those specific acts with extrinsic evidence. In practice, this means you can cross-examine a witness about a specific act that might reflect dishonesty and the witness can respond or explain, but you cannot introduce other witnesses or documents to prove that act to impeach. The rule keeps impeachment focused on credibility rather than turning it into a separate mini-trial about past conduct. A requirement for a prior order or admitting extrinsic evidence “in any form” would go beyond what Rule 608 allows.

Rule 608 focuses on impeachment of a witness’s truthfulness. The main idea is that you may attack credibility by reputation or opinion about truthfulness, or by asking about specific acts on cross-examination. But you may not prove those specific acts with extrinsic evidence. In practice, this means you can cross-examine a witness about a specific act that might reflect dishonesty and the witness can respond or explain, but you cannot introduce other witnesses or documents to prove that act to impeach. The rule keeps impeachment focused on credibility rather than turning it into a separate mini-trial about past conduct. A requirement for a prior order or admitting extrinsic evidence “in any form” would go beyond what Rule 608 allows.

Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy